fonsfaq sub
Apr. 23rd, 2011 02:34 pmHey guys! I'm doing asexuality/aromanticism for the Frequently (or Not So Frequently) Asked Questions project and I've been asked something that I can't answer. Would anyone like to take it?
The question is:
What's your favourite and least favourite thing to read about asexuality in fiction?
And I... can't think of a single example of or reference to (textual/canon) asexuality in books/fiction I've read. :|
The question is:
What's your favourite and least favourite thing to read about asexuality in fiction?
And I... can't think of a single example of or reference to (textual/canon) asexuality in books/fiction I've read. :|
no subject
Date: 2011-04-23 06:58 pm (UTC)Also that the magical blood was not used as an excuse for his asexuality!
Um, I liked him, too. Mostly because it was just a part of him and not his defining character trait, as you said.
I am afraid of in the future it becoming a thing like Dumbledore's homosexuality - JKR never said he was with a woman, therefore he was gay. I don't want to see "but I never said Character X was with someone, so clearly they were asexual!" But, um, now I'm just off-topic.
no subject
Date: 2011-04-23 07:11 pm (UTC)You see, he started out as gay but became asexual because one love affair went wrong, since "asexual" is something you turn into and not, like, a legit orientation or anything. Ho ho ho. (Her handling of his homosexuality is iffy as shit too, but that's neither here nor there.)
no subject
Date: 2011-04-23 07:17 pm (UTC)He can lead a celibate and bookish life! I am okay with that sentence. Why didn't she just start and end with that one and be done with it without insulting people?
*headdesk* what the fuck, world.
no subject
Date: 2011-04-23 07:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-23 07:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-23 07:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-23 11:21 pm (UTC)Oh, you're right! Yeah, that was great.
*nods* He had other interests and skills, and was invested in his friendships.
I don't want to see it handled that way, yeah. That wouldn't be a good way to handle aromanticism, either.